The third grade team at LeRoy alternates units
between social studies and science. Typically they spend a month on each unit.
When I first began my clinical experience in Traci’s classroom they were
starting a social studies unit on explorers. Me being the history buff I am
really enjoyed this and jumped right into the activities. It was fun to teach
the kids more of the history component to social studies because that is my
passion. I had my explorer lesson all set to go but unfortunately was unable to
teach it.
When I got back they were already done with the
unit on explorers. They were working on taking their ISAT. After testing had
finished the third grade team has bow started introducing the topic of simple
machines. This was good and bad for me because I could no longer teach my
explorer lesson. However, I did get to teach my science lesson on the lever.
After talking with Traci we have decided that when
she moves from the simple machines unit to the famous inventors unit covering
the social studies end that this will be a perfect time for me to teach my
lesson. I am going to teach on April 25th at 10 am. I haven’t
decided if I want to teach my lesson on Ben Franklin or Thomas Edison. However,
I know that with either inventor I can plan some fun historical interactive
lessons.
I am really excited to teach this lesson because
history is a passion of mine. I originally was a history secondary education
major. This is why I love our class because I think it is vital to teach
students about the past and how we can learn from our mistakes.
Last semester I was at Tri- Valley in Downs. It
hard for me to compare the two social studies units to say if one is better
then the other. At Tri-Valley they were not interactive and fun like at LeRoy. It
was more work sheet based, writing and reading.
Overall, I think LeRoy does a good job encompassing
social studies into their teaching. I don’t know if I like how they alternate
between science and social studies monthly. Where at Tri- Valley they
alternated science and social studies every other day. Honestly, I am so unsure of my feelings
on the two situations that I can’t give either a fair assessment at this point.
I think they both have great qualities, I know once I teach everyday I will a better
understanding of what I prefer and what I don’t prefer.
Honestly, I think Traci does a great job teaching
about the past and is sensitive to every child and their backgrounds, Traci
always makes sure to tell her students before she begins a lesson and says that
if at any time they feel uncomfortable to put their head down on the table. This
way she will know to stop the conversation. This was a great learning
experience for me because all students should feel safe in their classroom
otherwise they won’t want to learn. That is the last thing any educator wants.
Traci knowing this deters any negative feelings from happening. History is one
of those topics that can be had for others, which is why I believe many schools
try to ignore it all together which doesn’t do any good. Children need to know
about the past because they are our future.
My question for Traci is. I want to know what her
teaching philosophy is when it comes to social studies in general?
Becky,
ReplyDeleteI am so glad that you have enjoyed the SS focus at your site because of your love for the SS. I think it's awesome that you are so interested in history--I know Jordan O. is also very interested--it's also a passion of mine:). When we get to history content in a few weeks, we'll have a blast in class! Thinking about the SS structure at your site, it is important to consider your own emotions towards this, but almost more importantly are the outcomes of this structure on the kids. Does the format of alternating SS and science quarterly help them learn better? Does it seem disconnected to them? You might talk with your CT about what she thinks of this and what the kids think to better help you understand if this would be something you'd like to pursue in the future.
:)Kira